SCOTUS Chevron decision spawns ‘more questions than answers’
The SCOTUS decision may have other ripples in another branch of government: Congress.
By Mary Hightower
U of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture
July 12, 2024
Fast facts
- June 28 decision overturns 40-year precedent
- Decision may affect recent WOTUS actions
(362 words)
(Newsrooms: With art of Rollins)
LITTLE ROCK — Effects of the U.S. Supreme Court’s “Chevron deference” decision on agriculture and environmental law — such as the definition of Waters of the United States — may take years to play out, said Brigit Rollins, staff attorney with the National Agricultural Law Center.
The June 28 ruling overturned a 40-year-old doctrine which said that courts should generally defer to federal agencies for the rules they make, with the assumption that the agencies are subject matter experts and that the rules are reasonable. Chief Justice John Roberts, in a 35-page decision, called the doctrine “fundamentally misguided.”
“While the court said was that previous cases that relied on Chevron could not be reopened in light of this decision,” she said. “Things like WOTUS — the current definition of the Waters of the U.S. — are still out there. The current definition hasn’t really had a judge look at it at all.
“It hasn't been ruled on under Chevron deference, which means that's fair game,” she said.
The process to define “waters of the U.S.” has been controversial, and the Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have struggled to craft a lasting definition since the Clean Water Act was adopted by Congress in 1972.
The latest definition was issued in August 2023 after SCOTUS ruled in May in the case of Sackett vs. EPA, gutting the previous definition.
The SCOTUS decision may have other ripples in another branch of government: Congress.
“The biggest takeaway is that the court is pretty much saying it is our job to tell you what the law is to interpret agency statutes,” Rollins said. “In the past they've used this doctrine of Chevron deference to defer to reasonable agency interpretations of statutes when Congress has been ambiguous or otherwise silent.
“I think it does put greater pressure on Congress to be more specific and precise when they are drafting statutory language,” she said. “It puts the onus on Congress to be very clear when they’re making a grant of authority to an agency on what that agency is authorized to do, and what it is not authorized to do.”
Right now, “we have a lot more questions than answers,” Rollins said.
To learn about extension programs in Arkansas, contact your local Cooperative Extension Service agent or visit www.uaex.uada.edu. Follow us on X and Instagram at @AR_Extension. To learn more about Division of Agriculture research, visit the Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station website: https://aaes.uada.edu. Follow on X at @ArkAgResearch. To learn more about the Division of Agriculture, visit https://uada.edu/. Follow us on X at @AgInArk.
About the Division of Agriculture
The University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture’s mission is to strengthen agriculture, communities, and families by connecting trusted research to the adoption of best practices.
Through the Agricultural Experiment Station and the Cooperative Extension Service, the Division of Agriculture conducts research and extension work within the nation’s historic land grant education system.
The Division of Agriculture is one of 20 entities within the University of Arkansas System. It has offices in all 75 counties in Arkansas and faculty on five system campuses.
The University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture offers all its Extension and Research programs to all eligible persons without regard to race, color, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, national origin, religion, age, disability, marital or veteran status, genetic information, or any other legally protected status, and is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer.
# # #
Media contact: Mary Hightower
mhightower@uada.edu