Win some, lose some, Corporate Transparency Act gets SCOTUS ruling, but injunction still in effect
On Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Treasury Department, overturning an injunction put in place last month by a federal court in Texas in the Texas Top Cop Shop case. However, the Jan. 7 order issued by another federal district court in the Smith/Means case remains in place.
By Mary Hightower
U of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture
Fast facts
- SCOTUS overturns lower court ruling
- Separate federal injunction remains in place
(450 words)
(Newsrooms: with file art of Rumley)
FAYETTEVILLE, Ark. — If the Corporate Transparency Act had a theme song, it would probably be “The Long and Winding Road.”
The legal switchbacks for CTA, a law intended to dampen financial fraud, are happening across two primary court cases, Texas Top Cop Shop v. Garland, and Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of Treasury.
On Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Treasury Department, overturning an injunction put in place last month by a federal court in Texas in the Texas Top Cop Shop case. However, the Jan. 7 order issued by another federal district court in the Smith/Means case remains in place.
“Yesterday the Supreme Court stayed the injunction that prohibited enforcement of the CTA as challenged in the Texas Top Cop Shop case, reinstating reporting requirements until the litigation has finished,” said Elizabeth Rumley, senior staff attorney for the National Agricultural Law Center, part of the University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture. “If this were the only case at issue, that would have been the end of the story. However, early this month another federal district court judge had considered the issue and issued a second injunction, which was not affected by yesterday’s ruling.”
The bottom line is this: “as of Jan. 24, the Corporate Transparency Act is not enforceable,” Rumley said. Business owners should note, however, that this injunction could be lifted or other circumstances could change at any time.”
If you’ve following along at home, here’s the timeline:
- March 1, 2024 — a U.S. District Court in Alabama, suspended the law’s requirements for plaintiffs in the Business United v. Yellen case.
- 3, 2024 — U.S. District Judge Amos Mazzant issues a nationwide injunction in the case of Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. Garland.
- 23, 2024 — In Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. Garland, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the law’s reporting requirements.
- 26, 2024 — In Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. Garland, another three-judge panel of the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated their colleagues’ decision three days earlier, reinstating the stay until after the appeals on the merits of the case had been heard.
- Jan 7, 2025 – U.S. District Judge Jeremy Kernodle issues a nationwide injunction in the case of Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. U.S. Department of the Treasury.
- 23, 2025 — SCOTUS lifts the injunction from the CTA case of Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. Garland
- March 25, 2025 — Texas Top Cop Shop appeal scheduled to be heard by the full U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans.
The Corporate Transparency Act was still a little-known law heading into the months before the deadline for businesses to file beneficial owner information in order to comply. The act was passed in 2021 with a goal of cracking down on shell companies and preventing money laundering. Reporting required by the law began Jan. 1, 2024, and was expected to affect more than 32 million businesses, including more than 230,000 farm operations, according to the American Farm Bureau.
To learn about extension programs in Arkansas, contact your local Cooperative Extension Service agent or visit www.uaex.uada.edu. Follow us on X and Instagram at @AR_Extension. To learn more about Division of Agriculture research, visit the Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station website: https://aaes.uada.edu. Follow on X at @ArkAgResearch. To learn more about the Division of Agriculture, visit https://uada.edu/. Follow us on X at @AgInArk.
About the National Agricultural Law Center
Created by Congress in 1987, the National Agricultural Law Center serves as the nation’s leading source of agricultural and food law research and information. The NALC works with producers, agribusinesses, state and federal policymakers, lenders, Congressional staffers, attorneys, land grant universities, students, and many others to provide objective, nonpartisan agricultural and food law research and information to the nation’s agricultural community.
The NALC is a unit of the University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture and works in close partnership with the USDA Agricultural Research Service, National Agricultural Library.
About the Division of Agriculture
The University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture’s mission is to strengthen
agriculture, communities, and families by connecting trusted research to the adoption
of best practices. Through the Agricultural Experiment Station and the Cooperative
Extension Service, the Division of Agriculture conducts research and extension work
within the nation’s historic land grant education system.
The Division of Agriculture is one of 20 entities within the University of Arkansas System. It has offices in all 75 counties in Arkansas and faculty on three campuses.
The University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture offers all its Extension and Research programs to all eligible persons without regard to race, color, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, national origin, religion, age, disability, marital or veteran status, genetic information, or any other legally protected status, and is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer.
# # #
Media contact: Mary Hightower
mhightower@uada.edu