Posts
Contact
Kristin Higgins
Public Policy Center
Phone: 501-671-2160
Email: khiggins@uada.edu
Office:
University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture
Cooperative Extension Service
2301 S. University Avenue
Little Rock, AR 72204
University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture
Cooperative Extension Service
2301 S. University Avenue
Little Rock, AR 72204
Voters Will Have Say on Issue 4, Court Decides
Arkansas will vote Nov. 8 whether to allow licenses to grow and sell non-medical marijuana in the state.
The Arkansas Supreme Court on Sept. 22 ruled that votes cast for or against Issue
4 will be counted.
Responsible Growth Arkansas appealed to the court after the Arkansas Board of Election
Commissioners wouldn't certify their ballot title for the proposal, which would allow
adults 21 and older to legally possess one once of marijuana for non-medical purposes.
Under Issue 4, adults could purchase recreational marijuana from 80 new dispensaries
allowed under the proposal or from existing medical marijuana dispensaries in the
state.
"Amendment 7's reservation to the people of the initiative power lies at the heart
of our democratic institutions," the majority court opinion stated, citing a 1994
court opinion.
"We give the ballot title a liberal construction and interpretation in order that
it secure the purposes of reserving to the people its power. And we recognize that
it is impossible to prepare a ballot title that would suit everyone. With these standards
in mind, we conclude that the ballot title at issue is complete enough to convey an
intelligible idea of the scope and import of the proposed amendment."
Arkansas is one of five states, including Missouri, voting on opening up marijuana
sales to adults. Sponsors in a sixth state, Oklahoma, found out this week they would
have to wait until 2024 for their recreational marijuana issue to be on the ballot.
Justice Shawn Womack wrote in his dissent opinion that he thought the ballot title
was partially misleading and the state had been correct to reject it.
"The proposed ballot title claims it is adding the requirement for child-proof packaging
and restrictions on child-targeted advertising in its proposed amendment; it is not.
In fact, the proposed amendment will repeal the existing safeguards against child
consumption and replace them with far less stringent ones," Womack wrote.